The Standard
Moral clarity does not excuse factual carelessness.
My work combines lived experience, public records, credible reporting, academic and policy research, systems analysis, financial modeling, and the perspectives of people directly affected by the issues being examined.
I am not neutral about whether Black lives matter, whether disabled and neurodivergent people deserve accommodation, or whether human dignity should depend on income, influence, race, geography, or public attention. But advocacy and accuracy are not opposites.
The work requires both.
01Separate facts from allegations.
Confirmed information, claims, analysis, and unanswered questions should not be blurred together.
02Attribute claims clearly.
Family, attorney, advocate, witness, and official statements should be identified for what they are.
03Distinguish suspicion from proof.
A troubling or suspicious circumstance is not the same thing as a proven crime or established fact.
04Correct meaningful errors visibly.
Accuracy includes being willing to update the record when better information becomes available.
05Do not reduce people to trauma.
A person’s life should not be flattened into the worst thing that happened to them or the way the public learned their name.
06Say when the evidence does not support the claim.
Even when a popular interpretation fits a broader concern, the available evidence still has to carry it.